Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Success! Now Check Your Email

To complete Subscribe, click the confirmation link in your inbox. If it doesn't arrive within 3 minutes, check your spam folder.

Ok, Thanks

US Supreme Court to Hear Dispute Over Trump Documents

The US Supreme Court has decided to take up a case concerning whether Democratic Party lawmakers should be allowed to sue to obtain documents surrounding the former Washington, D.C., hotel owned by former Pres. Trump.

Improve the News Foundation profile image
by Improve the News Foundation
US Supreme Court to Hear Dispute Over Trump Documents
Image credit: CBS

Facts

  • The US Supreme Court has decided to take up a case concerning whether Democratic Party lawmakers should be allowed to sue to obtain documents surrounding the former Washington, D.C., hotel owned by former Pres. Trump.1
  • Democrats on the House Oversight Committee first launched their legal bid against the then-executive branch to retrieve the records in 2017, having been denied access to information about the Trump International Hotel by the former president.2
  • The case, officially called Carnahan v. Maloney, was dismissed in 2018 by a federal circuit court before the decision was overturned in a US Court of Appeals by a 2-1 panel vote in 2020.3
  • Democrats wish to investigate how in 2013 a lease agreement between the General Services Administration (GSA) and the Trump Old Post Office LLC allowed a federal office to be transformed into a hotel. Trump sold the hotel in 2022, which is now reopened as a Waldorf Astoria.4
  • The case currently sees House Democrats face off against the Biden Administration, who have aligned with the Trump-era policy to only respond to demands for information from the House majority.5
  • Lawsuits have accused Trump of violating the US Constitution's anti-corruption provisions by maintaining ownership of his businesses while in office. Despite this, the Biden admin. has appealed to SCOTUS on the basis of potentially setting a dangerous precedent by letting House committee minorities request information as they please.6

Sources: 1The Hill, 2Associated Press, 3USA Today, 4CBS, 5POLITICO, and 6US News & World Report.

Narratives

  • Pro-Trump narrative, as provided by The Western Journal. While the case will be heard in the fall, the 95-year-old law used by House Democrats lacks any real legal precedent and has not led to any previously significant rulings. The decision will be important to clarify how such a law should be used in the future when a compromise between the legislative and the executive branches fails to occur.
  • Democratic narrative, as provided by Citizens for Ethics. Since Trump’s hotel turned into the Waldorf, visits — and spending — by prominent Republican political figures have all but dried up. It is certainly clear that whatever Trump’s intentions were, in reality, what the hotel was used for was more than simply a night’s stay and cocktails, but rather influence.

Predictions

Improve the News Foundation profile image
by Improve the News Foundation

Get our free daily newsletter

Success! Now Check Your Email

To complete Subscribe, click the confirmation link in your inbox. If it doesn’t arrive within 3 minutes, check your spam folder.

Ok, Thanks

Read More