Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Success! Now Check Your Email

To complete Subscribe, click the confirmation link in your inbox. If it doesn't arrive within 3 minutes, check your spam folder.

Ok, Thanks
School Shooter's Parents Receive Maximum Sentences
Image credit: Bill Pugliano/Stringer/Getty Images News via Getty Images

School Shooter's Parents Receive Maximum Sentences

Jennifer and James Crumbley, who were tried and convicted separately of involuntary manslaughter for not stopping their teenage son from carrying out a school shooting, were each sentenced Tuesday to 10-15 years in prison....

Improve the News Foundation profile image
by Improve the News Foundation
audio-thumbnail
0:00
/1861

Facts

  • Jennifer and James Crumbley, who were tried and convicted separately of involuntary manslaughter for not stopping their teenage son from carrying out a school shooting, were each sentenced Tuesday to 10-15 years in prison.1
  • The sentences handed down by an Oakland County Circuit judge matched the maximum permissible under the law and what prosecutors had requested. This case marked the first time parents of a mass school shooter were charged with involuntary manslaughter.2
  • In Nov. 2021, the Crumbley's son, Ethan, killed four people and wounded seven others with a handgun at Oxford High School. Now 17, he is serving a life sentence on several charges, including murder.3
  • Crumbley's parents were found guilty in their unprecedented cases because they were deemed negligent in preventing their son from obtaining a weapon, which prosecutors said could've been accomplished with ordinary care.4
  • Prosecutors also said the parents didn't take steps to address mental health issues that had been brought to their attention, including during a meeting at the school just hours before the shooting.5
  • Prior to the judge's sentencing, the court heard statements from family members of the victims. Jennifer and James Crumbley also read statements expressing contrition.4

Sources: 1New York Times, 2The Detroit News, 3Associated Press, 4USA Today and 5FOX News.

Narratives

  • Narrative A, as provided by Independent. These cases mark a change in the application of firearms law for the better. By making this into a gun safety issue — which even the most ardent supporter of the Second Amendment should be able to get behind — prosecutors can hold gun owners responsible for failing to keep their firearms safe, secure, and away from those who may use them for wrongdoings.
  • Narrative B, as provided by Daily Caller. These parents never should've been charged — never mind convicted and sentenced. The Crumbleys didn't break any law that exists on the books, as they didn't do, plan, or participate in their son's crime. This is opening a Pandora's Box for future criminal prosecution of people who haven't broken the law but may be loosely connected to someone who does.

Predictions

Improve the News Foundation profile image
by Improve the News Foundation

Get our free daily newsletter

Success! Now Check Your Email

To complete Subscribe, click the confirmation link in your inbox. If it doesn’t arrive within 3 minutes, check your spam folder.

Ok, Thanks

Read More