New Pandas Arrive at DC National Zoo From China

0:00

/1861

1×

Facts

• A new pair of giant pandas, Bao Li and Qing Bao, arrived in Washington, DC, on Tuesday, ending an 11-month panda absence at the Smithsonian National Zoo.^[1][2]
• The three-year-old pandas are part of a new 10-year agreement between the US and China, with the zoo paying $1M annually for conservation efforts. This comes after the previous US-China deal ended last year, leading some to believe China would withhold future panda visits amid rising tensions between the two nations.^[3][4]
• The pandas will undergo a quarantine period of at least 30 days before being introduced to the public, with their debut scheduled for Jan. 24.^[5][3]
• Bao Li has familial ties to the National Zoo, as his mother, Bao Bao, was born there in 2013, and his grandparents, Mei Xiang and Tian Tian, lived at the zoo for 23 years.^[3]
• The National Zoo recently completed a $1.7M renovation of its panda enclosure, the first since 2006, adding new features such as a climbing structure and a large pool.^[5]
• Giant pandas have been reclassified from 'endangered' to 'vulnerable' on the global list of species at risk of extinction. According to data from 2014, the number of wild pandas sat at 1,860 — a 17% rise from 10 years earlier.^[2]

Sources: ^[1]Guardian, ^[2]Al Jazeera, ^[3]Daily Caller, ^[4]USA Today and ^[5]Forbes.

Narratives

• Narrative A, as provided by Time. The return of pandas to the National Zoo is a significant boost for DC's tourism industry and cultural identity. These beloved animals were an iconic part of the city's story for decades, attracting visitors and generating excitement that benefits local businesses. Their presence also symbolizes improved diplomatic relations between the US and China.
• Narrative B, as provided by New York Times. These panda exchanges cause more harm to the animals than benefits, all in the name of prestige and financial boosts for the zoos. China has removed far more pandas than it has released, and keeping them in captivity lowers the likelihood of them mating and does nothing to improve their genetic diversity. It's important to consider the ethical implications of these programs.