Missouri Executes Marcellus Williams Amid Innocence Claims
Marcellus Williams was executed by lethal injection in Missouri on Tuesday after the US Supreme Court denied a request to delay his execution....
Facts
- Marcellus Williams was executed by lethal injection in Missouri on Tuesday after the US Supreme Court denied a request to delay his execution.[1][2]
- Williams, who long maintained his innocence, was convicted in 1998 of stabbing Felicia Gayle 43 times during a burglary at her home in the St. Louis suburbs. The execution took place despite counsel from the office that prosecuted him 21 years ago expressing doubts about the case.[3]
- Recent DNA evidence suggested the murder weapon had been contaminated by prosecutors who handled it without gloves. The evidence, along with concerns about constitutional errors during the jury selection process, prompted St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney Wesley Bell to seek to overturn the conviction.[4][5]
- While Gayle's family and Bell sought to commute the sentence to life in prison — and a plea agreement was reached between Williams and Bell in which he would serve life without parole — Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey rejected the deal.[6]
- Williams was previously scheduled for execution in 2015 and 2017, but his execution was delayed both times due to appeals. His most recent appeal was rejected by Gov. Mike Parson and the Missouri Supreme Court.[7]
- Williams is the third inmate executed in Missouri in 2024. He was pronounced dead at 6:10 pm CT on Tuesday, with his son and legal team present.[4]
Sources: [1]USA Today, [2]FOX News, [3]France 24, [4]CBS, [5]New York Post, [6]Guardian and [7]CNN.
Narratives
- Left narrative, as provided by Huffington Post and Youtube. In further evidence of the US' broken justice system, a potentially innocent man was executed. With both the prosecutor's office and the victim's family requesting that the execution be halted, there is no reason that this should have happened. Faulty DNA evidence and suggestions that racism may have played a part in the jury selection process cast doubts on Williams guilt that should have been explored.
- Right narrative, as provided by Youtube. Supporters of Williams are cherry-picking arguments from biased organizations like the Innocence Project. He was convicted of murder after a lengthy legal process, and no credible evidence had overturned his guilt, even after several appeals. The death penalty is a serious topic, but cut-and-dried cases like this shouldn't be thrown into the category of unjust executions.