Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Success! Now Check Your Email

To complete Subscribe, click the confirmation link in your inbox. If it doesn't arrive within 3 minutes, check your spam folder.

Ok, Thanks
Judge Orders Starbucks to Reinstate Union Organizer
Image credit: Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images News via Getty Images

Judge Orders Starbucks to Reinstate Union Organizer

A federal labor law judge on Tuesday ordered Starbucks to reinstate former employee and labor organizer Jaz Brisack, who had resigned in 2022 after the coffee chain reportedly ignored her request for fewer working shifts.

Improve the News Foundation profile image
by Improve the News Foundation

Facts

  • A federal labor law judge on Tuesday ordered Starbucks to reinstate former employee and labor organizer Jaz Brisack, who had resigned in 2022 after the coffee chain reportedly ignored her request for fewer working shifts.1
  • Robert Ringler, an administrative law judge with the National Labor Relations Board, observed that Starbucks had compelled Brisack to quit by not accommodating her scheduling needs, violating her rights under labor law.2
  • Judge Ringler also asked Starbucks to reinstate and provide back pay to nine pro-union employees it fired for their unionization efforts, noting the coffee chain violated labor laws by "implicitly threatening store closure because of employees' Union activities."3
  • While Starbucks claimed it fired the nine workers from western New York stores for absences, the company had allegedly not disciplined absences from workers who refrained from participation in union activities.1
  • Last September, Mara-Louise Anzalone, an administrative law judge with the National Labor Relations Board, also found that Starbucks violated federal labor law by increasing wages and offering new perks only to non-union employees.4

Sources: 1ABC News, 2The Seattle Times, 3Forbes and 4CNN.

Narratives

  • Narrative A, as provided by Common Dreams. Starbucks' attempts to bend or break US labor laws as well as its intent — sabotage employees' attempts to improve their lives — is out in the open. Despite around 300 stores across the US deciding to unionize, the coffee chain refuses to see the obvious. Its preferential treatment of those staying away from union activities amounts to mistreatment of those exercising their legitimate rights.
  • Narrative B, as provided by The New York Times. Starbucks' management has met with union representatives at least 85 times in the past few years. Besides regular pay, which approaches around $27 per hour on average, the coffee chain extends multiple benefits, like stock grants and parental leave, to thousands of its employees worldwide. Branding this conscientious corporation as anti-worker or "union-busting" is disingenuous.

Predictions

Improve the News Foundation profile image
by Improve the News Foundation

Get our free daily newsletter

Success! Now Check Your Email

To complete Subscribe, click the confirmation link in your inbox. If it doesn’t arrive within 3 minutes, check your spam folder.

Ok, Thanks

Read More