China Bans Dual-Use Mineral Exports to US
China announced on Tuesday an immediate ban on gallium, germanium, antimony, and other 'superhard' mineral exports that may be used for military purposes to the US....
0:00
/1861
Facts
- China announced on Tuesday an immediate ban on gallium, germanium, antimony, and other 'superhard' mineral exports that may be used for military purposes to the US.[1][2]
- In a statement, Beijing claimed export controls on these materials had been implemented to 'safeguard national security and interests and fulfill international obligations such as non-proliferation.'[3]
- The ban comes after the Biden admin.'s new restrictions on semiconductor exports to China announced on Monday, which affected 140 Chinese companies and expanded controls on chip-making equipment.[4][5]
- China accounts for 94% of gallium and 83% of germanium production, which are essential for manufacturing semiconductors, solar technology, and military equipment.[6]
- Chinese customs data reveal no shipments of germanium or gallium to the US through Oct. 2023, while antimony shipments fell 97% after previous export limits took effect.[7]
- The materials affected by the ban have dual-use applications in both civilian and military sectors. This includes semiconductors, electric vehicle batteries, infrared technology, fiber optic cables, and ammunition production.[8]
Sources: [1]CNN, [2]Washington Examiner, [3]Globaltradealert, [4]Firstpost, [5]France 24, [6]The Times of India, [7]Al Jazeera and [8]Guardian.
Narratives
- Pro-China narrative, as provided by Global Times and Chinadaily. The actions of the United States represent a malicious attempt to suppress China's technological progress, disrupt global supply chains, and undermine market principles. As Washington politicizes and weaponizes economic trade and technological issues, export restrictions are necessary to protect the PRC's national security interests.
- Anti-China narrative, as provided by New York Times and FT. Washington's export controls were introduced to prevent the PRC from boosting its military capabilities using advanced technology. However, Beijing's tit-for-tat response is unfair, seriously undermines international trade rules, and severely escalates tensions in supply chains. It's a trade war that has no winners.
