Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Success! Now Check Your Email

To complete Subscribe, click the confirmation link in your inbox. If it doesn't arrive within 3 minutes, check your spam folder.

Ok, Thanks
California Governor Vetoes Contentious AI Safety Bill
Image credit: Chip Somodevilla/Staff/Getty Images News via Getty images

California Governor Vetoes Contentious AI Safety Bill

California Governor Gavin Newsom (D-Calif.) has vetoed an artificial intelligence (AI) safety bill that would have provided first-in-the-US safety measures for large AI models....

Improve the News Foundation profile image
by Improve the News Foundation

Facts

  • California Governor Gavin Newsom (D-Calif.) has vetoed an artificial intelligence (AI) safety bill that would have provided first-in-the-US safety measures for large AI models.[1]
  • The bill, known as SB 1047, would have mandated third-party testing and whistleblower protections to prevent 'severe harm' such as mass casualties or property damage over $500M.[2]
  • Newsom blocked the bill, authored by Democratic State Senator Scott Wiener, stating it fails to consider 'whether an AI system is deployed in high-risk environments' or if it 'involves critical decision-making or the use of sensitive data.'[3][4]
  • He said the bill applied 'stringent standards to even the most basic functions' and that California needs 'workable guardrails' for generative AI.[5]
  • However, Wiener claimed his bill is a 'light-touch' requirement that many AI majors have already voluntarily committed to, adding that Newsom's veto leaves AI companies with 'no binding restrictions from U.S. policymakers.'[6]
  • Backed by AI firms like Elon Musk's xAI and Amazon-backed Anthropic, the bill targeted AI models that cost more than $100M to develop.[7]

Sources: [1]New York Times, [2]South China Morning Post, [3]CNN, [4]CNA, [5]Reuters, [6]Fortune and [7]CBS.

Narratives

  • Narrative A, as provided by Ft. This bill risked stifling innovation, particularly among smaller AI companies and open-source developers. It focused on hypothetical risks rather than practical, targeted safety solutions. Newsom's decision preserves California's leadership in AI by promoting a more balanced, science-based approach to regulation that supports innovation while effectively addressing safety concerns.
  • Narrative B, as provided by GovTech. Newsom has retreated from a crucial first step toward meaningful regulation of potentially dangerous AI technologies. SB 1047 sought to regulate AI to prevent catastrophic harm while encouraging responsible development. Newsom's veto is a missed opportunity, compromising proactive governance and preserving the status quo.

Predictions

Improve the News Foundation profile image
by Improve the News Foundation

Get our free daily newsletter

Success! Now Check Your Email

To complete Subscribe, click the confirmation link in your inbox. If it doesn’t arrive within 3 minutes, check your spam folder.

Ok, Thanks

Read More