Ex-WaPo Editor: Bezos Struck 'Quid-Pro-Quo' Deal With Trump

0:00

/1861

1×

Facts

• Former Washington Post editor-at-large Robert Kagan, who resigned last Friday following the paper's decision not to endorse a candidate in the US presidential election, has alleged that The Post's owner, Jeff Bezos, struck a secret deal with former Pres. Donald Trump to drop its planned endorsement of Vice Pres. Kamala Harris.^[1][2]
• Kagan claims that Trump met with executives at Blue Origin — Bezos' space exploration company — the same day as The Post's announcement and there was a 'quid pro quo' agreement to end the paper's decades-long practice of endorsing a presidential candidate.^[3][4]
• Kagan added that The Post's decision to pull the Harris endorsement had 'been in the works for some time.' However, there was no explanation for the announcement's timing, and a spokeswoman for The Post said that ending presidential endorsements was solely a 'Washington Post decision.'^[5][6]
• Will Lewis, The Post's publisher, has since released a statement saying the decision not to back a presidential candidate was 'made entirely internally,' claiming that the paper did not speak to either campaign about the decision. He described reports to the contrary as 'simply incorrect.'^[7]
• Bezos's Blue Origin — an American aerospace manufacturer — has a $3.4B contract with the federal government to build 'a human landing system as NASA's second provider to deliver Artemis astronauts to the lunar surface,' per NASA Administrator Bill Nelson.^[8][9]

Sources: ^[1]New York Post, ^[2]New York Times (a), ^[3]AlterNet, ^[4]ConservativeHQ, ^[5]The Daily Beast, ^[6]New York Times (b), ^[7]Washington Post, ^[8]NASA and ^[9]Blue Origin.

Narratives

• Republican narrative, as provided by Breitbart and World News. The Post's decision to refrain from endorsing a presidential candidate is a step toward true journalistic neutrality. It allows readers to form their own opinions without undue influence from the paper. The allegations of a quid pro quo are baseless and ignore the publisher's stated reasons for the decision.
• Democratic narrative, as provided by Guardian and Huffington Post. The decision not to endorse a candidate is a cowardly move that undermines democracy. It's a clear example of corporate interests bowing to political pressure, potentially sacrificing journalistic integrity for financial gain. This sets a dangerous precedent for media self-censorship and could further erode press freedom.

Predictions