Australians Vote 'No' in Historic Indigenous Rights Referendum
Facts
- On Saturday, Australia overwhelmingly rejected a proposal to amend the Constitution to recognize First Nations people and create a new advisory body to the federal parliament and government.1
- This comes as Australians voted in the country's first referendum in nearly a quarter of a century, dubbed 'The Voice,' with a national majority as well as majorities in four of six states being required for the proposal to be successful.2
- With roughly 80% of the ballots counted nationwide, the 'No' vote has secured 60.7% of the national vote and majorities in all six states plus the Northern Territory. The Australian Capital Territory was the only jurisdiction to record a 'Yes' vote.3
- Following the defeat of the 'Yes' campaign, some Indigenous leaders announced a 'week of silence' while Prime Minister Anthony Albanese stated that Australia must now find a different way to the 'same reconciled destination.'4
- Meanwhile, opposition leader Peter Dutton called on the country to unite after the 'prime minister's divisive referendum,' demanding the government to shift its focus on the cost-of-living crisis in Australia and suggesting an audit of spending on Aboriginal programs.5
- The Indigenous citizens of Australia, who have inhabited the continent for nearly 65K years, make up about 3.8% of the country's population of 26M.6
Sources: 1BBC News, 2Reuters, 3ABC Australia, 4SBS Language, 5The Guardian and 6Al Jazeera.
Narratives
- Left narrative, as provided by The Guardian. Australia's First Nations people have endured generations of discrimination, exclusion, and outright theft. The referendum was a way to try and unite the country, but it failed due to a misinformation campaign that steered the debate away from the core issues. The result damages Australia's image in the world regarding how it treats Indigenous people.
- Right narrative, as provided by American Spectator. A Yes vote for the Indigenous Voice referendum — a distraction from achieving practical and positive outcomes — would have let politicians widely seen as untrustworthy to create the set of rules governing the body while dividing Australians along racial lines without actually reducing Indigenous disadvantage and marginalization.